Dividends4Life: The Dividend Stock Life Cycle

The Dividend Stock Life Cycle

Posted by D4L | Tuesday, February 10, 2009 | | 2 comments »

The renewing of life. There is nothing more natural than the live birth of a child. In this birth there is life, hope, unlimited potential, and yes, eventually death. Though we don't like to focus on it, death is just as natural as birth. In much the same way, it is natural for a percentage of dividend stocks to fail each year, either in not raising their dividend or literally ceasing to exist. As we plan for out own death by buying life insurance and making final arrangements, we must have a plan in place for when inevitable happens and we must sell an under-performing dividend investment.

Dividend investors are looking for solid companies that consistently grow their dividends. Last week Pfizer Inc. (PFE) cut its dividend by 50%, and as such is no longer suitable for my dividend portfolio. The quandary faced when selling a stock after a dividend cut is replacing the lost income without assuming undue risk. As with most stocks, PFE's price had declined over time and the stock was yielding over 7% prior to the dividend cut announcement. Immediately, after the announcement the stock dropped 7% and was only yielding around 4%. Fewer dollars are now available to replace income from the previous higher yield. So what do you do to replace this income without assuming unreasonable risk?

Fortunately, I had built up a risk reserve by purchasing lower risk stocks and trimming my positions in higher risk investments over the last several months. My portfolio was poised to take additional risk, but I limited the risk to the amount needed to replace the lost income. This was done in a two step process:

  1. With the cash received from the PFE sale, I purchased shares of Eli Lilly and Co (LLY) to help preserve my sector allocation. At the time, LLY was yielding slightly over 5% and was rated less risky than PFE prior to the announcement. This dividend income from this purchase fell well short of that lost from the PFE sale.

  2. With limited funds available, I had to assume additional risk to get yield needed to maintain the prior level of dividend income. To accomplish this, I opted to purchase a small block of CenturyTel Inc (CTL) yielding around 10%.
PFE and CTL were both classified as high risk stocks and each had the exactly same risk rating. With LLY classified as a medium risk stock, I now had fewer dollars in the higher risk category, thus the overall risk of my portfolio is now lower and I am earning slightly more dividend income. There are good and bad ways to increase your portfolio's return. As the old saying goes, when life hands you lemons, choose to make lemonade.

(Photo Credit)


Related Articles:

________________________________________________________________

2 comments

  1. Anonymous // February 11, 2009 at 2:03 AM

    HEy

    Good article, but I have a question.

    Imagine you buy a dividend stock as you did with Pfizer. Let's say you bought it 20 $ and you get 4 % return. But 5 years later, the company has to cut its dividend. So you decide to sell and buy another stock. But when selling and because of the bad news you only get 15$ per share, so you make a loss. What's the point in doing that? I mean i could understand it is a good stategy but i would need some further details to see the balance between the dividend you got during 5 years and the lowest share price when selling.

    Good day

  2. Anonymous // February 11, 2009 at 8:26 AM

    Anon: A stock that cut its dividend no longer fits into my dividend investing strategy of holding stocks that consistently increase their dividends. My experience has been that a stock price continues to decline after a cut and a secnd cut is much more likely after the first.

    Best Wishes,
    D4L

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Dividend Growth Stocks News

~

Popular Posts Last 30 Days