Last week in my the article "Who is Ben Grossbaum and Why Should We Listen to Him?", I profiled Benjamin Graham and his lasting contributions to the investing community. One of the metrics I look at when considering the fair-value of a company is the "Graham Number". The formula is as follows:Price = Square Root (22.5 x Book Value x EPS)
For Book Value, I use Tangible Book Value per share. There are so many odd intangibles (goodwill, customer relations, patents, licenses, contractual rights, etc.) that U.S. companies are now forced to record under purchase accounting that a pure book value could easily skew the calculation. Since Tangible Book Value is usually less than Book Value, the resulting price is generally more conservative. Thus, if a stock is ever selling below its Graham Number, my quantitative analysis will automatically give it a star for being fair valued.
For EPS, I am currently using a trailing 12-months. It has been suggested by some that I should be using an average trailing three years. This would help normalize any unusual swings in earnings, both positive and negative. My inclination would be to use the lower of the two, which would provide a more conservative result.
The 22.5 is a little more involved. Graham believed that the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) should be no more than 15 and the price-to-book value ratio (P/B) should be no more than 1.5. He did note that a P/E ratio below 15 could possibly justify a higher P/B ratio. Thus, he used as a general rule of thumb that the product of the two should not be more than 22.5 (15 x 1.5). That is how the 22.5 is derived (15 x 1.5). The 15 P/E is a result of Graham wanting his portfolio to have a yield equal yield to that of a AA bond. Over long periods of time, AA bonds have yielded 7.5%, on average. The inverse of this yield is 1 divided by 7.5%, or 13.3 (rounded up to 15) became the target P/E ratio for his portfolio.
Like all calculations of fair value, the Graham Number should be considered with all other available information and not used in isolation when making a buy or sell decision.
Related Articles:
________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
~
Popular Posts Last 30 Days
-
As a relatively new blogger, the one thing that has stood out in my mind is the number of Canadian bloggers in the areas that I am most inte...
-
GameStop (NYSE:GME) lost about 40% of its market value over the past three years, as rising digital downloads and declining mall traffic thr...
-
In a capitalistic society, opportunities to generate (mostly) passive income are all around us. Dividend growth investing is one of the most...
-
These elite income producers have rallied this year. Their brilliance at producing passive income seems to have caught the market's eye ...
-
Investors buy dividend stocks for a few reasons. For one, they provide income via dividends that act as a bonus on top of capital appreciati...
-
If you are looking for reliable dividends, these three Dividend Kings should be right up your alley. Dividends are paid at the discretion of...
-
Buying dividend stocks can be tricky. Oftentimes, stocks that pay exorbitantly high dividends have underlying financial problems, and their ...
-
While optimism in the broader market remains robust – particularly for hyped-up sectors like technology – investors may still want to consid...
-
A strong dividend investing strategy may be to focus on high-quality names that score well on several dividend-related metrics. In other wor...
-
When many investors think about tech stocks, they often think first about high-growth names that come with outsized risk -- not mature, divi...
D4L,
I have been using TTM EPS. However using lower value of TTM and three year average makes sense. Thanks for the tutorial.
DT
Great post! I had read B. Grahams books a few years ago and forgot about 'The Graham Number'. I think I might try and work it into some of my analysis going forward now that it has been jogged back into my memory ;-)