Last week in my the article "Who is Ben Grossbaum and Why Should We Listen to Him?", I profiled Benjamin Graham and his lasting contributions to the investing community. One of the metrics I look at when considering the fair-value of a company is the "Graham Number". The formula is as follows:Price = Square Root (22.5 x Book Value x EPS)
For Book Value, I use Tangible Book Value per share. There are so many odd intangibles (goodwill, customer relations, patents, licenses, contractual rights, etc.) that U.S. companies are now forced to record under purchase accounting that a pure book value could easily skew the calculation. Since Tangible Book Value is usually less than Book Value, the resulting price is generally more conservative. Thus, if a stock is ever selling below its Graham Number, my quantitative analysis will automatically give it a star for being fair valued.
For EPS, I am currently using a trailing 12-months. It has been suggested by some that I should be using an average trailing three years. This would help normalize any unusual swings in earnings, both positive and negative. My inclination would be to use the lower of the two, which would provide a more conservative result.
The 22.5 is a little more involved. Graham believed that the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) should be no more than 15 and the price-to-book value ratio (P/B) should be no more than 1.5. He did note that a P/E ratio below 15 could possibly justify a higher P/B ratio. Thus, he used as a general rule of thumb that the product of the two should not be more than 22.5 (15 x 1.5). That is how the 22.5 is derived (15 x 1.5). The 15 P/E is a result of Graham wanting his portfolio to have a yield equal yield to that of a AA bond. Over long periods of time, AA bonds have yielded 7.5%, on average. The inverse of this yield is 1 divided by 7.5%, or 13.3 (rounded up to 15) became the target P/E ratio for his portfolio.
Like all calculations of fair value, the Graham Number should be considered with all other available information and not used in isolation when making a buy or sell decision.
Related Articles:
________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
~
Popular Posts Last 30 Days
-
Investors often seek out income stocks to hold forever, counting on the income to make up for a rocky market. The stock market’s steep drop ...
-
The silver lining of the market sell-off in 2022 is that it has created plenty of dirt cheap dividend stocks that investors can buy now and ...
-
Many companies will see their interest expenses rise, but the ones whose management was savvy enough to lock in debt at fixed rates should d...
-
When trouble hits, the first instinct is to run but if you insist on holding your ground, you might want to consider pivoting your funds tow...
-
The Fed raised the benchmark interest rates by 75 basis points yesterday, marking the largest hike in 28 years. The central bank is slated t...
-
These three dividend payers act as a safe harbor in turbulent markets, each providing time-tested returns to investors. With the S&P 500...
-
The S&P 500 recently fell into a bear market, defined as a 20% year-to-date drop, which has ramifications for dividend stocks. The good ...
-
Earlier we looked at the RQ (Risk/Quality) ratings of individual stocks. This was a good start to help us understand the risk profile of a ...
-
Looking for some diversification in your portfolio? This closed-end fund, or CEF, offers a mix of fixed income and equity strategies. We beg...
-
Rising interest rates are good for banks because it allows them to charge more for lending services. However, if those higher rates squash h...
D4L,
I have been using TTM EPS. However using lower value of TTM and three year average makes sense. Thanks for the tutorial.
DT
Great post! I had read B. Grahams books a few years ago and forgot about 'The Graham Number'. I think I might try and work it into some of my analysis going forward now that it has been jogged back into my memory ;-)