Dividends4Life: Yield on Cost: Measuring for Success

Yield on Cost: Measuring for Success

Posted by D4L | Monday, November 19, 2007 | , | 7 comments »

This article appeared in The Carnival of Personal Finance #128.

If the first step in sucuessfully managing something is to determine the desired outcome (set a goal), then the logical second step is to determine how to measure your progress to ensure you are moving toward your goal. Most investors look at anualized returns and compare it to a benchmark when evaluating their portfolio. Beyond benchmarking an annualized return, there is a great disparity in how investors measure their progress. One of the more interesting metrics I track is Yield on Cost (YOC). It is simply the annual dividend rate times number of shares owned divided by what you paid for the investment (basis).

Many knowledgeable investors are quick to point out that YOC is an irrelevant metric. They argue that current yield is what is meaningful when comparing investments. They are correct in this statement. YOC is entirely specific to the timing of an investment. You can have a different YOC for the same investment purchased at different times on the same day. It is totally determined by the price paid.

If the objective of an income investor is to invest in securities with increasing income over time, the best metric to measure your success in achieving this objective is Yield on Cost. An illustrative example will help. Consider two companies RY and KO. Let's assume you purchase both companies at their low in 1997 and hold them through 2006.

If you were judging your investments solely on current yield, they would be virtually the same in 2006 at slightly over 3%. However, based on your original investment, the YOC for RY is more than six times that of KO. This occurred while the average dividend growth rate for RY was only double that of KO - now that is the kind of leverage I like!

As an income investor, I would much rather have held RY during this period.

As mentioned in my post Dividend Income vs. MMA, dividend growth is the reason you choose an equity investment over over a safer investment such as a high-yield Money Market Fund. I track YOC because I expect it to grow over time. At the time of this writing I own 28 equity investments in my dividend/income portfolio. The YOC on them is 4.95%. Using my projection model and assuming that I don't purchase any additional shares in the future, these are the YOCs I would expect to see in the coming years:

  • Now 4.95%
  • 1-yr 5.32%
  • 3-yr 6.23%
  • 5-yr 7.42%
  • 8-yr 9.97%
  • 10-yr 12.41%
  • 15-yr 23.00%
  • 20-yr 46.38%

46% in 20 years - that's something to get excited about. In reality, I think I can beat that by fine-tuning my portfolio.

For additional information on YOC, I refer you to the article The Magic of Yield on Cost. It was written by the CEO of Realty Income (O). Let me also add that Realty Income produces the most entertaining annual reports I get each year.

What are your thoughts about yield on cost?

Related Articles:

Click here to have future posts delivered to you for free!



  1. Anonymous // November 20, 2007 at 8:55 PM

    In addition to YOC and current yield, you can also measure yield based on the after-tax capital. For example, if you think your stock AAA is overvalued, and are considering selling it to purchase BBB, you first must calculate how much capital remains after selling AAA.

    Say $100 in AAA is distributing $3. If the embedded capital gain tax is $20, then your yield on after-tax capital is $3/$80 = 3.75%. If BBB is yielding 3.5%, maybe you want to keep AAA even though the current yield is only 3%.

    (I'm assuming both AAA and BBB have identical fundamentals.)

  2. D4L // November 20, 2007 at 9:28 PM

    FJ: That is an excellent point! So many times we subconsciously forget to consider the tax ramifications. Trading is not free - from many standpoints...

    Best Wishes,

  3. Anonymous // November 30, 2007 at 6:25 PM

    Interesting point on KO vs. RY on YOC. KO kind of got to bubbly valuation in 1997 so I'm assuming it would have been ruled 'too expensive' to the cautious eye.

    I have been investing for a short time but my best YOC differential is 0.3% difference with several of my holdings includng RY and BAC.

    I also find this statistic very interesting. It really shows the pace of dividend growth and the pace of share price growth at the same time. I guess in the case of RY vs. KO it shows whether or not dividend growth was paired to share price growth as it was with RY and not KO.

  4. Anonymous // December 1, 2007 at 9:11 AM

    KO is currently trading at a significant premium based on my models.

    You have to look at YOC in layers for a single investment. As noted in my Investing Goals post, YOC will be more sensitive to the yields of what I am buying, versus dividend increases in the early years due to the relative size of the purchases versus the portfolio size. When I wrote the YOC article my YOC was 4.95%, and after a couple of purchases it is now 4.88%.

    Comparing today's yield with YOC for my BAC holdings, it would not look good in total (5.93% yield today vs. 5.39% YOC). However it looks like this if you break it down in layers:

    Date Pur.. Yield@Pur. YOC
    04/22/05... 4.01% ... 5.71%
    04/13/06... 4.34% ... 5.56%
    01/12/07... 4.15% ... 4.75%
    07/05/07... 5.18% ... 5.18%

    I love watching that 04/22/05 layer's yield shoot up!

  5. Unknown // May 10, 2008 at 2:40 PM

    It is simply the annual dividend rate times number of shares owned divided by what you paid for the investment (basis).

    I am a little lost.

    Using your example with RY, am I right in understanding that based on the YOC that RY is better to buy in 2006 than it was in 1997?

    If you bought one share in 1997 and one share in 2006, how does this affect the YOC?

    I suppose I am just trying to figure out if YOC is more of an effective measurement for when to buy if the stock is low and you know the company has a history of raising dividends/consecutive dividend payouts.

  6. Anonymous // May 10, 2008 at 10:47 PM

    TheLocoMono: YOC is really a metric that measures dividend yield and dividend growth. In effect it calculates a yield by basis by current annual income. This shws the effect of not only the initial yield, but the compound growth of that yield. That is why some stocks with a low initial yield are better buys than some with a higher yield. My NPV MMA Diff. calculation looks at this over 20 years and discounts it back. The higher the number the better.

    Hope this made some sense.

    Best Wishes,

  7. tom dicks // October 30, 2009 at 10:26 PM

    i don't believe there is any better benchmark for dividend investors i plan to us it as ameurse of my dividend geezer portfolio

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.


Popular Posts Last 30 Days