tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2371295367923834063.post5539482585586254425..comments2008-03-14T12:12:47.838-05:00D4Lnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2371295367923834063.post-41992569774807703772008-03-14T12:12:00.000-05:002008-03-14T12:12:00.000-05:00

The Investor: An 8% could be good if the companies yield is higher than WalMart's 1.9%. At that yield and growth rate it would under-perform a MMA by about $2500 per thousand invested (assuming the MMA is earning earning a 20-year average of 4.61%).<BR/><BR/>For WalMart I see one of two things happening:<BR/><BR/>1. The 8% is a one-year anomaly. This happened in 2002 when its dividend increased

Dividends4Lifehttp://dividends4life.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2371295367923834063.post-70374013026305352692008-03-14T06:12:00.000-05:002008-03-14T06:12:00.000-05:00

Hey 4Life,<BR/><BR/>What's the Yield on Walmart? I have to say that if I was US investor I'd be tempted to buy into that company. (In fact, perhaps I should buy in now while the $ is low and get more bang for my buck!)<BR/><BR/>An 8% rise is huge in my book for a behemoth like Walmart, and I love how the chart has gone nowhere for a few years. In big dividend payers that's a chance to get on the

The Investormonevator.comnoreply@blogger.com