Over the last six to eight months, there have been several prognosticators saying the market has finally hit bottom. In most cases they were quickly proven wrong as stocks continued to decline. What's an investor to do? When is the right time to start investing?
If you are a trader, peaks and bottoms are very important. You want to sell at the peak and buy back into the market at the bottom and wait for the next peak. The problem is peaks and bottoms are much easier to identify once some time has passed. An alternative to this market timing approach is a long-term buy-and-hold strategy that focus on dividend stocks selected using a value oriented approach.
Not only are many dividend stocks are selling at a discount to their five-year highs, but many are selling at a discount based on their current fair value calculations. Consider these five stocks:
1. United Technologies Corp. (UTX) - Analysis
Five-year High: $107.88
Five-year Low: $37.56
Calculated Fair Value: $56.27
Recent price: $50
2. PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) - Analysis
Five-year High: $79.57
Five-year Low: $45.81
Calculated Fair Value: $55.10
Recent price: $50
3. Chevron Corp. (CVX) - Analysis
Five-year High: $103.09
Five-year Low: $50.51
Calculated Fair Value: $72.91
Recent price: $65
4. Procter & Gamble Co. (PG) - Analysis
Five-year High: $111.18
Five-year Low: $44.18
Calculated Fair Value: $64.36
Recent price: $50
5. Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) - Analysis
Five-year High: $72.22
Five-year Low: $46.60
Calculated Fair Value: $62.25
Recent price: $55
The five-year high and low numbers were based on the data from April 30, 2004 to April 30, 2009. The calculated fair value is the lower of the Mid-2 valuation or the NPV MMA Diff. needed to achieve a predefined target.
The beauty of an income focused long-term, buy-and-hold strategy is the future declines are not necessarily a bad thing. This allows you to buy more shares at a lower price which in turn will provide you with a higher yield. There isn't going to be a giant neon sign in the sky that tells you, "The market has now reached its bottom, it is now safe to start investing again."
For those still looking for the bottom, let me leave you with this week's call from an acclaimed economist. Robert J. Gordon, a macroeconomist and professor at Northwestern University thinks the recession is over. He is one of seven members of the elite Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Analysis (the people who decide officially, for the record books, when recessions begin and end). Gordon bases his call on an indicator that he says the Committee never even looks at: the so-called “jobless claims” number that is released every Thursday morning. According to Gordon’s research, in every recession since 1974, the peak in jobless claims came within weeks of the bottom of the recession. It appears this number might have peaked in early April.
Just as a stopped clock has the correct time two times a day, eventually one of these guys will get it right. Filter out the noise, have an investing plan and stick with it.
Full Disclosure: Long in all the aforementioned companies. See a list of all my income holdings here.(Photo: Gerard79)
Related Articles:
Should You Be Investing In Equities Now?
Posted by D4L | Sunday, May 31, 2009 | commentary | 0 comments »_____________________________________________________________________
Wealth Accumulation And Risk Go Together
Posted by D4L | Thursday, May 28, 2009 | commentary | 0 comments »
If your goal is to accumulate wealth for a comfortable retirement, then there is no risk-free path. Throughout time every angle has been tried and failed. However, some approaches carry less risk than others. Let's consider some of the popular paths.
Cash/Money Markets/CDs - "Cash Investments"
I have always considered "Cash Investments" an oxymoron. Cash is where some investors park their money when they believe the investment risk is greater than the potential return - their sole focus is capital preservation. Unfortunately, some people consider Cash/Money Markets/CDs et.al. as investments. This is a dangerous assumption. Their slow and predictable growth is generally always below inflation, but since it is growing the "investors" often lulled into a false sense of security and do not notice that they are actually losing ground each year until it is too late.
Land/Real Estate - "They aren't making anymore land."
Many investors have discovered the hard way that bubbles can also occur in the real estate sector. What was once seen as a safe place to put your money and forget it is now in the midst on an ugly down-turn. According to S&P, home prices tumbled by 19.1 percent in the first quarter, the most in its 21-year history. Home prices have fallen 32.2 percent since peaking in the second quarter of 2006 and are at levels not seen since the end of 2002. Still, there are no signs home prices have hit bottom. "We see no evidence that a recovery in home prices has begun," said, David M. Blitzer, chairman of the S&P index committee.
Gold/Precious Metals
If you look at a historical chart of gold prices, you will see a pattern, gold spikes to a new level during a crisis, then comes down to a level above the previous steady state. It then trades sideways until the next crisis. It would be hard to time your retirement to coincide with a crisis/spike.
Professionally Managed Equity Mutual Funds
Every year several professionally managed mutual funds out-perform the market. Unfortunately, it is rarely the same funds each year. It has been well documented that over time, most professionally managed funds under-perform the market.
Treasuries/Bonds
Treasuries and bonds tend to be less risky than equity investments, but have historically under-performed equities. It is important to note that there is risk associated with them. For corporate bonds, the companies could default and not pay them. For all bonds, including those issued by government, there is an interest rate risk - rising interest rates drive the price of bonds down. I do consider bonds an important part of my asset allocation. You can purchase bonds directly in the open market or bundled in funds/ETFs. Below are some low-cost Vanguard bond ETFs:
Also, if you live in the U.S. you can purchase Savings Bonds via TreasuryDirect.gov. However, recent changes in this program have made it less appealing.
The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Barclays Capital 1-5 Year Government Index. This index includes U.S. Government, investment-grade corporate, and international dollar-denominated bonds, with maturities between 1 and 5 years.
The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Barclays Capital 5-10 year Government/Credit Index. This index includes U.S. Government, investment-grade corporate, and international dollar-denominated bonds with maturities between 5 and 10 years.
The Fund seeks to match the investment performance of the Barclays Capital Mutual Fund Long Government/Corporate Index.
The Fund seeks to generate returns that track the performance of the Barclays Capital Aggregate Bond Index, and will maintain a dollar-weighted average maturity consistent with that of the index. The Index measures investment-grade, taxable fixed income securities in the U.S.
Index Funds/ETFs/CEFs
For most people, indexed investments including mutual funds, exchange traded funds (ETFs) and closed end funds (CEFs) should make up the core of their investment allocation. In effect, you are aligning your investment risk with what the index fund tracks. If you believe that over time that certain index funds, such as the S&P 500, will outperform the the various approaches listed above, you should have money invested in it. Index funds allow you to easily track any sector, market cap or index. Here are some varied funds in this category:
Individual Stocks
The Fund seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index that measures the investment return of large-capitalization stocks. The Fund employs a "passive management" approach designed to track the performance of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index.
The Fund seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the MSCI EAFE Index (international).
The Fund seeks investment results corresponding to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Dow Jones US Basic Materials Sector Index. Component firms are involved in the production of aluminum, chemicals, commodities, chemical specialty products, steel, and other goods and resources.
The Fund seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Dow Jones US Real Estate Index. Uses a representative sampling strategy. Component firms include hotel and resort firms and REIT's.
Inherently, individual stocks will carry higher risk due to the lack of diversification when evaluated on a stand-alone basis. You can mitigate this risk to a degree by selecting solid dividend paying companies with a track record of increasing their dividends each year. Some of my personal favorites in this category are:
When it comes to investing your money, there is no escaping risk. A good investor will determine the desired outcome and and invest in a way to acheive their goal with minimal risk.
Full Disclosure: Long BLV, VFINX, EFA, IYM, IYR. See a list of all my income holdings here.
Related Articles:

_____________________________________________________________________
Stock Analysis: Eli Lilly and Co (LLY)
Posted by D4L | Tuesday, May 26, 2009 | commentary | 0 comments »This article originally appeared on The DIV-Net May 18, 2009.
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Eli Lilly and Co (LLY). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis:
Company Description: Eli Lilly and Company discovers, develops, manufactures and sells prescription drugs that offers a wide range of treatments for neurological disorders, diabetes, cancer, and other conditions. The company also sells animal health products.
Fair Value: I consider four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
LLY is trading at a discount to 1.) and 3.) above. If I exclude the high and low valuations and average the remaining two, LLY is trading at a slight discount. LLY earned a Star in this section since it is trading at a fair value.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section I consider five factors, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
LLY earned one Star in this section for 3.) above. LLY has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1885 and has increased its dividend payments for 42 consecutive years.
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA)? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
LLY earned both of the available Stars in this section. The NPV MMA Diff. of the $10,982 is in excess of the $2,500 minimum I look for in a stock that has increased dividends as long as LLY has. LLY's current yield of 5.74% exceeds the 3.64% estimated 20-year average MMA rate.
Other: LLY is a member of the S&P 500, a Dividend Aristocrat and a member of the Broad Dividend Achievers™ Index. Like all pharmaceutical companies, LLY faces generic challenges to the its branded patents. The company must continuously development new drugs and face regulatory risks. LLY has a robust pipeline and a diverse drug portfolio with limited near-term patent expirations. Risks include competitive pressures and failure of new drugs to perform.
Conclusion: LLY earned one Star in the Fair Value section, earned one Star in the Dividend Analytical Data section and earned two Stars in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a net total of four Stars. This quantitatively ranks LLY as a 4 Star-Buy.
Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the share price could increase to $52.55 before LLY's NPV MMA Differential fell to the $3,000 that I like to see for a stock with 42 consecutive years of dividend increases. At that price the stock would yield 3.73%.
Resetting the D4L-PreScreen.xls model and solving for the dividend growth rate needed to generate the needed $3,000 NPV MMA Differential, the calculated rate is -2.2%. This dividend growth rate is negative and well below the below the 4.3% used in this analysis, thus providing a margin of safety. LLY has a risk rating of 2.00 which classifies it as a medium risk stock.
Looking at the attached PDF, the first thing the grabs your attention are the graphs showing LLY's 2008 earnings and cash flow. The company realized record cash flows while earnings plummeted. This is usually a result of the company recording a non-cash accounting charge. In LLY's case, the company completed its acquisition of ImClone Systems Inc., resulting in a significant charge of $4.69 billion ($4.46/share) for acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D) and reached resolution on government investigations related to its past U.S. marketing and promotional practices for Zyprexa®, resulting in an additional charge of $1.48 billion. I recently added to my position and will consider future additions below my $34.70 buy price. For additional information, including the stock's dividend history, please refer to its data page.
Disclaimer: Material presented here is for informational purposes only. The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I was long in LLY (3.8% of my Income Portfolio).
What are your thoughts on LLY?
Related Articles:

_____________________________________________________________________
For your reading pleasure, the articles listed below contain some of the best dividend and value investing insights found on the web. They were written by various members of the Dividend Investing and Value Network (DIV-Net) over the past week:
Articles From DIV-Net Members
There are some really good articles here, please take time and read a few of them.

_____________________________________________________________________
There Are Dividend Stocks Beating The S&P 500
Posted by D4L | Sunday, May 24, 2009 | commentary | 0 comments »
So far in 2009, the Dividend Aristocrats have under-performed the S&P 500. However there are several dividend stocks that have done quite well and beat the S&P 500 index, and some of those companies just might surprise you!
Below are ten dividend stocks that have out-performed the S&P 500 this year through May 15, 2009:
10. Coca-Cola Co (KO) - Return: 0.4% - Yield: 3.76%
The Coca-Cola Company engages in the manufacture, distribution, and marketing of nonalcoholic beverage concentrates and syrups worldwide. Risk Rating: Low (1.50) - Analysis
9. Sysco Corp (SYY) - Return: 0.5% - Yield: 4.20%
SYSCO Corporation, through its subsidiaries, engages in the marketing and distribution of a range of food and related products primarily for foodservice industry in the United States and Canada. Risk Rating: Low (1.00) - Analysis
8. BP ADR (BP) - Return: 1.4% - Yield: 7.37%
This supermajor integrated oil company (formerly BP Amoco p.l.c.) is based in London and is the world's second largest publicly owned oil company and the fourth largest U.S. refiner. Risk Rating: Medium (1.75) - Analysis
7. 3M Co (MMM) - Return: 1.8% - Yield: 3.52%
3M Co. is a diversified technology company with a presence in various businesses, including industrial & transportation, healthcare, display & graphics, consumer & office, safety, security & protection services, and electro and communications. Risk Rating: Low (1.50) - Analysis
6. Paychex Inc (PAYX) - Return: 4.1% - Yield: 4.63%
Paychex, Inc. provides payroll and integrated human resource and employee benefits outsourcing solutions for small- to medium-sized businesses in the United States. Risk Rating: Medium (1.75) - Analysis
5. Intel Corp (INTC) - Return: 5.6% - Yield: 3.69%
Intel Corporation engages in the manufacture and sale of semiconductor chips, as well as in the development of advanced integrated digital technology platforms for the computing and communications industries worldwide. Risk Rating: Medium (1.75) - Analysis
4. Canadian National Railway ADR (CNI) - Return: 7.0% - Yield: 2.24%
Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) operates Canada's largest railroad, linking customers in Canada, the U.S., and Mexico through approximately 20,400 miles of track. Risk Rating: Low (1.25) - Analysis
3. Manulife Financial Corp ADR (MFC) - Return: 8.0% - Yield: 4.78%
Manulife Financial Corporation is a life insurance company with customers in the United States, Canada and Asia. It is the holding company of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and John Hancock Financial Services. Risk Rating: Medium (1.75) - Analysis
2. CenturyTel Inc (CTL) - Return: 13.5% - Yield: 9.27%
CenturyTel Inc. provides a range of telephone services in 25 states, with operations concentrated in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri and Wisconsin. Risk Rating: High (2.50) - Analysis
1. Royal Bank of Canada ADR (RY) - Return: 22.8% - Yield: 4.47%
Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) offers a range of banking and financial services in North America and internationally. Risk Rating: Low (1.50)
Over the same period the S&P 500 (VFINX) was down 1.2%. The returns were calculated using Yahoo's dividend adjusted stock price for December 31, 2008 as the starting point. Some interesting items to note: The list contains four ADRs (3 Canadian, 1 British). RY's dividend has been frozen since November 2007. CTL is the only High Risk stock to make the list based on my risk rating. The top five were less traditional dividend stocks that had been beaten down to low levels.
Short-term performance is never the sole reason for long-term investors to buy. What goes up significantly usually comes back down. Case in point, last years two dividend darlings, Wal-Mart (WMT) and McDonalds (MCD), found themselves in the bottom ten of this list, each down 13.2%.
Full Disclosure: Long in all the aforementioned securities. See a list of all my income holdings here.
Related Articles:

_____________________________________________________________________
Quick, who is the world's largest exporter? China? Japan? Would you be shocked to learn it is the U.S.? Contrary to the "Made in China" stamps on clothing labels in Wal-Mart (WMT) and on the bottom of McDonald's (MCD) Happy Meal toys, the U.S. still leads the world in exports. To be a successful investor, we must keep things in perspective.
Despite what the mainstream media would lead you to believe, the U.S. manufacturing sector has not slipped behind all other industrialized nations in the world. Michael Brush in a recent MSN article points out that the U.S. is still far and away the largest manufacturer in the world. Below are some interesting highlights from the article:
According to the US Department of Commerce, the largest export markets for U.S. goods in 2008 (with percent increase over 2007) were Canada ($261.4 billion, up 5.0%), Mexico ($151.5 billion, up 11.4%), China ($71.5 billion, up 9.5%), Japan ($66.6 billion, up 6.2%), and Germany ($54.7 billion, up 10.2%). Consider these three prominent U.S. manufacturers:
Boeing (BA) - Yield: 3.77%
BA is the US's largest exporter, largest aircraft producer in the world and the second-largest aerospace and defense contractor. The company produces civilian planes, military jets, helicopters, missiles, satellites and other aerospace equipment and employs around 135,000 people employed throughout the U.S.
Nucor Corp (NUE) - Yield: 3.35% - Analysis
NUE is one of the few steel companies in the U.S. to remain competitive in its industry. It has streamlined and decentralized its management, and is on the leading edge when it comes to employee relations and their productivity.
Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) - Yield: 4.46% - Analysis
Eventhough CAT has foreign manufacturing facilities, much of the company's equipment is still made in the U.S. While the U.S. economy sputtered in 2008, CAT's exports from U.S. plants topped $16 billion, up from $12.6 billion billion dollars in 2007. CAT employs 53,000 people in 28 states.
The US economy is still the largest in the world. At $46,000 per person in 2008, the GDP per capita, ranks around number ten in the world and the U.S. economy has enjoyed a stable overall GDP growth rate and a low unemployment rate over the years. Gloom and doom may sell papers and boost ratings, but when it is put in perspective, it is usually not nearly as bad as was originally presented.
Full Disclosure: Long WMT, MCD. See a list of all my income holdings here.
Related Articles:

_____________________________________________________________________
Stock Analysis: Illinois Tool Works Inc (ITW)
Posted by D4L | Tuesday, May 19, 2009 | analysis | 0 comments »This article originally appeared on The DIV-Net May 11, 2009.
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Illinois Tool Works Inc (ITW). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis:
Company Description: Illinois ToolWorks Inc. is a diversified manufacturer operates a portfolio of about 750 industrial and consumer businesses located throughout the world.
Fair Value: I consider four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
ITW is trading at a discount to only 1.) above. If I exclude the high and low valuations and average the remaining two, ITW is trading at a 28.8% premium. ITW had a Star deducted for trading at a premium in excess of 5%.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section I consider five factors, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
ITW earned one Star in this section for 3.) above. ITW has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1933 and has increased its dividend payments for 46 consecutive years.
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA)? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
ITW earned both of the available Stars in this section. The NPV MMA Diff. of the $3,245 is in excess of the $2,500 minimum I look for in a stock that has increased dividends as long as ITW has. If ITW grows its dividend at 5.1% per year, it will take 1 year to equal the cumulative earnings from a MMA yielding an estimated 20-year average rate of 3.64%. ITW earned a Star since its Years to >MMA of 1 is less than 5 years.
Other: ITW is a member of the S&P 500 and a member of the Broad Dividend Achievers™ Index. ITW has a strong balance sheet with a relatively low debt and generates high levels of free cash flow relative to net income. Looking ahead, ITW should continue to grow EPS via acquisitions and share repurchases. Risks would include a continued downturn in industrial activity and/or capital spending, integration of acquisitions and continued escalation of raw material costs.
Conclusion: ITW lost one Star in the Fair Value section, earned one Star in the Dividend Analytical Data section and earned two Stars in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a net total of two Stars. This quantitatively ranks ITW as a 2 Star-Weak stock.
Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the share price could increase to $35.34 before BRC's NPV MMA Differential fell to the $3,000 that I like to see for a stock with over 25 consecutive years of dividend increases. At that price the stock would yield 3.51%.
Resetting the D4L-PreScreen.xls model and solving for the dividend growth rate needed to generate the needed $3,000 NPV MMA Differential, the calculated rate is 4.8%. This dividend growth rate is slightly below the 5.1% used in this analysis, thus providing a small margin of safety. ITW has a risk rating of 1.75 which classifies it as a medium risk stock.
2009 will likely be a difficult year for ITW due to the slowing global economy, along with reduced activity in the automotive and construction industries. ITW is a good company, but currently selling at a premium. Given its near-term prospects, we will likely see entry points closer to my buy price of $26.92. For additional information, including the stock's historical dividend information, please refer to its data page.
Disclaimer: Material presented here is for informational purposes only. The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I was long in ITW (2.8% of my Income Portfolio).
What are your thoughts on ITW?
Related Articles:

_____________________________________________________________________
For your reading pleasure, the articles listed below contain some of the best dividend and value investing insights found on the web. They were written by various members of the Dividend Investing and Value Network (DIV-Net) over the past week:
Articles From DIV-Net Members
There are some really good articles here, please take time and read a few of them.

_____________________________________________________________________
Several banks have learned the hard way that when you get the U.S. government's money, even in the form of a loan, as a bonus you get the government's "help" running your business. Needless to say, this is not very appealing to most businesses. Looking at the country's deficit, the government doesn't specialize in running anything in the black. So what's a company to do when they realize they're in a bad relationship?
Kelly King, Chairman and CEO of BB&T (BBT), a large U.S. regional bank and vocal critic of the government's bank bailout plan, described its participation in the TARP program as "destructive." King went on to say “Our plan is to repay the TARP funds as soon as it is humanly possible. It creates excessive controls, it has a negative impact on our people and our strategies and it runs a great risk of politicizing the lending process, which is very unhealthy.”
On May 11th, BBT announced that it would sell $1.5 billion of stock and reduce its dividend by 68 percent so that it can repay a $3.1 billion investment. Goldman Sachs & Co (GS), JPMorgan (JPM) and Morgan Stanley (MS) are arranging the stock offering.
Having previously increased its dividend for 37 consecutive years, this is a tough pill for a once-proud Dividend Aristocrat to swallow. King said the decision marked "the worst day in my 37-year career," and pledged to increase the payout when he can. Like most dividend cutters, BBT's shares plummeted falling over 7.5% on the day of the announcement and another 7.5% on the following day.
BBT wasn't the only one running from the government's "help". Two other large U.S. banks that passed the government's "stress test" announced stock offerings on Monday to raise capital in order to repay their TARP debt. U.S. Bancorp (USB), the parent company of U.S. Bank, said Monday that it has launched a $2.5 million public offering of its common stock and Capital One Financial Corp. (COF) also announced a public offering of 56 million shares of its common stock.
As with all individual income stocks that cut their dividends, I immediately sold my entire position in BBT after reading the announcement.
Full Disclosure: No position in the aforementioned stocks. See a list of all my income holdings here.
Related Articles:

_____________________________________________________________________
Dividend Investing and Bear Markets
Posted by D4L | Thursday, May 14, 2009 | commentary | 0 comments »
Dividend stocks have long been considered defensive stocks - those that you buy when the economy and the market go south. While everyone else is panicked about their portfolio’s decline, dividend investors see a downturn as an incredible buying opportunity.
Recently, Steven F. Shepich, a professional money manager with Ameriprise Financial sent me a white paper he wrote back in April titled "Dividend Investing in a Bear Market." I found it very interesting and when asked if I could share it with my readers, Steven graciously consented. Below are some highlights of the white paper:We are currently in a cyclical bear market (since October 2007) and a secular bear market (since 2000).
These were just some of the highlights, you can click here to read the entire report.
As of March 31, 2009 the price level of the S&P 500 Index was down 40% over the last year and 38% below the level it traded at ten years earlier. This is a strong indication that we are in both a cyclical bear market and a secular bear market. A secular bear market will begin at historic high earnings multiples and usually occurs during long-term periods of stress, turmoil, and political changes. Historic events such as World War I, the Great Depression, World War II, the Vietnam War, the fight for civil rights, and the 1970s oil embargo, all occurred during secular bear markets. In periods like this, investors’ long-term views are less optimistic, which results in a long-term downward trend in market valuations. A secular bear market will usually contain one or more major market corrections. Secular markets are different than cyclical markets which are shorter-term (one to five years) and usually revolve around the rise and fall of the economic cycle. Cyclical markets reflect economic changes in corporate earnings, while secular markets reflect long-term trends in valuation. Secular markets often contain multiple cyclical markets. For example, the crash of 1987 and the 90-91 recessions occurred during our last secular bull market (1982 – 2000).
We believe a dividend-based investment approach can be an effective strategy in secular bear markets for long-term investors.
We have just experienced the largest single year market decline since the Great Depression; the economic news appears to be moving from bad to worse; and there is a large degree of uncertainty going forward. Couple with this the fact that we are in a long-term secular bear market which could last another 10 years or more; the question becomes ….Why be invested in the market at all?
A dividend based investment approach involves investing in a diversified portfolio of stocks that provide stable dividend payments at attractive yields. Dividends provide income in down and flat markets, which can be reinvested and compounded over time. Furthermore, we believe significant cyclical market declines provide a unique investment opportunity for dividend oriented investors with a long-term time horizon. Dividends provide income in down and flat markets, which can be reinvested and compounded over time.
In our opinion, significant cyclical market declines (like the current one) provide a unique investment opportunity for dividend-oriented investors:
Dividends provided a significant benefit to long-term investors during and following the Great Depression.
It took more than 25 years (1929-1954) for the market to get back to the level reached before the 1929 crash. Including dividends in the equation tells a much different story. In fact, during the 25 year period that it took stock prices to get back to break-even, an investor who invested $100K and reinvested dividends would have seen his portfolio grow to $431K (a return of 331%).
Dividend stocks have out-performed the S&P 500 since the beginning of the current secular bear market.
Over the last nine years (3/00 – 3/09), the total return for the S&P 500 was negative 37.4% (-5.1% annualized), while the DJ Dividend Index had a total return of positive 34.0% (3.3% annualized). This leads us to conclude that the core cash return that dividends provide become more of a relevant factor in periods of multiple contraction (secular bear) than in periods of multiple expansion (secular bull).
What Have You Done For Me Lately?
Investing in stocks was a bit different in the 30’s than it is today. Back then, dividends were expected by investors and payout ratios were high, relative to today’s standards. The average yield during the 20s and the 30s ranged between 5% and 9%. During the last secular bull market (1982-2000), dividend yields gradually declined to an all time low, as valuations increased and investors became more interested in capital gains, to the point that in 2000 the dividend yield on the S&P 500 was barely over 1%.
According to return data obtain from Bloomberg, over the last seventeen years (3/92 – 3/09) the S&P 500 Index provided an annualized total return of 6.1%. During the same period the Dow Jones US Select Dividend Index (DJDVY) posted an annualized return of 8.9%. Put another way, a $100K investment in the DJDVY would have grown to $424K during that period, compared to $276K had it been invested in the S&P 500.
So how would five select individual dividend stocks that are in most every dividends investors portfolio fared against the S&P over the last two years? This chart compares the S&P 500 (VFINX) with:
The above chart (click to view full size) only considers the capital appreciation element. The table below layers in the effect of dividends:Dividend Adj. Prices 5/8/07 5/8/09 % Chng VFINX 132.88 125.53 -5.5% JNJ 60.23 64.92 7.8% PG 58.77 64.09 9.1% KO 50.12 54.48 8.7% MCD 46.29 57.97 25.2% WMT 46.35 56.13 21.1%
Good solid dividend stocks will not always out-perform the S&P 500 (see this year-to-date for example), but consistent and rising dividends certainly gives dividend stocks a head start.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing I was long in VFINX, JNJ, PG, KO, MCD, WMT. I received no compensation from Steven F. Shepich or Ameriprise Financial for writing this article. (view my income holdings)(Photo Credit)
Related Articles:

_____________________________________________________________________
This article originally appeared on The DIV-Net May 4, 2009.
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Brady Corp (BRC). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis:
Company Description: Brady Corp is an international manufacturer and marketer of solutions that identify and protect premises, products and people. Products include labels and signs, safety devices, printing systems and software, and precision die-cut materials.
Fair Value: I consider four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
BRC is trading at a discount to 1.), 2.) and 3.) above. If I exclude the high and low valuations and average the remaining two, BRC is trading at a 29.6% discount. BRC earned a Star in this section since it is trading at a fair value.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section I consider five factors, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
BRC earned two Stars in this section for 3.) and 4.) above. BRC has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1984 and has increased its dividend payments for 24 consecutive years. Its one year dividend growth rate exceeded its 5-year growth rate. This could indicate the growth rate is accelerating.
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA)? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
BRC earned one Star in this section for 2.) above. The NPV MMA Diff. of the $4,388 is below the $7,500 minimum I look for in a stock that has increased dividends as long as BRC has. If BRC grows its dividend at 7.6% per year, it will take 4 years to equal the cumulative earnings from a MMA yielding an estimated 20-year average rate of 3.64%. BRC earned a Star since its Years to >MMA of 4 is less than 5 years.
Other: BRC is a member of the Broad Dividend Achievers™ Index. In response to the global recession, BRC announced in November 2008 several initiatives to right-size their business and manage costs. Planned actions include a 10% reduction in the a global workforce, a company-wide salary freeze, continued reduction of discretionary spending and contingency plans for additional reductions in the event of more severe business downturn. BRC estimates approximately $30 million pretax of restructuring charges in fiscal 2009.
Conclusion: BRC earned one Star in the Fair Value section, earned two Stars in the Dividend Analytical Data section and earned one Star in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a net total of four Stars. This quantitatively ranks BRC as a 4 Star-Buy.
Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the share price could increase to $23.07 before BRC's NPV MMA Differential fell to the $3,280 that I like to see for a stock with 24 consecutive years of dividend increases. At that price the stock would yield 2.95%.
Resetting the D4L-PreScreen.xls model and solving for the dividend growth rate needed to generate the needed $3,280 NPV MMA Differential, the calculated rate is 6.6%. This dividend growth rate is below the 7.6% used in this analysis, thus providing a margin of safety. BRC has a risk rating of 1.50 which classifies it as a low risk stock.
BRC was a peasant surprise. With a 27% free cash flow payout ratio and a 36% debt to total capital, BRC's dividend should be sustainable in the near-term. The company's management has shown itself to be proactive in planning for the economic downturn. BRC is a company I would give serious consideration to below my $23.07 buy price. For additional information, including the stock's dividend history, please refer to its data page.
Disclaimer: Material presented here is for informational purposes only. The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I held no position in BRC (0.0% of my Income Portfolio).
What are your thoughts on BRC?
Related Articles:

_____________________________________________________________________
Income ETFs/CEFs: Are They Getting The Job Done?
Posted by D4L | Sunday, May 10, 2009 | commentary | 0 comments »Related Articles:
Dividend investing is not about buying high-yield stocks to generate a high income. Instead, dividend investing is all about finding solid dividend stocks that are reasonably priced and are expected to continue raising their dividends in the future. Most of the time their current yields aren't eye-popping, but the growing divdends over time will more than compensate for the current yield. So, are Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and Closed Ended Funds (CEFs) a good fit for this strategy?
A couple of years ago, I started adding select ETFs and CEFs to my income portfolio. At the time, my thought process was that these funds would diversify my risk and add a degree of stability to my income portfolio. Initially, I had high hopes for their success. Here's what I am holding and a synopsis of how they have performed:
Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH)
Vanguard® Financials ETF seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index that measures the investment return of financial stocks.
I first purchased VFH in August 2007. Like the financials it tracks, VFH's dividend has steadily fell from $0.45/share in October 2007 to $0.06/share in March 2009.
PowerShares International Dividend Achievers Portfolio (PID)
PID seeks to match the performance of the International Dividend Achievers Index by investing at least 90% of its total assets in dividend paying common stocks of this index. This index tracks the performance of dividend paying American Depositary Receipts or ordinary stocks trading on the NYSE, NASDAQ or AMEX.
I initially invested in this fund back in July 2008. It has paid out three dividends since then, each less than the one before (9/08-$0.14/share, 12/08-$0.09/share and 3/09-$0.03/share). Not a good trend.
Vanguard REIT ETF (VNQ)
Vanguard® REIT ETF seeks to provide a high level of income and moderate long-term capital appreciation by tracking the performance of a benchmark index that measures the performance of publicly traded equity REITs.
I initiated my VNQ position in August 2007. VNQ's dividends have been unpredictable and inconsistent.
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY)
The Fund seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before expenses, the price and yield of the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. The Fund uses a passive management strategy designed to track the price and yield performance of the Dividend Index.
I first purchased SDY in August 2007. I have received seven dividends ranging between a low of $0.4410 (April 2009) to a high of $0.5917 (January 2009). I found it somewhat odd that the low and high dividends both came in 2009.
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM)
Vanguard® High Dividend Yield ETF seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index that measures the investment return of common stocks of companies that are characterized by high dividend yields.
I first bought into VYM in August 2007. It dividends have slowly drifted lower since that time. They have not been as volatile, but there is no question as to the direction.
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG)
Vanguard® Dividend Appreciation ETF seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index that measures the investment return of common stocks of companies that have a record of increasing dividends over time.
VIG is another ETF that I first purchased in August 2007. During the time I owned it, VIG's dividend has flucuated between $0.22/share and $0.28/share.
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunity (ETO)
ETO is a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Fund’s investment objective is to provide a high level of after-tax total return. It invests primarily in dividend-paying common and preferred stocks.
I first purchased ETO in July 2008. ETO paid a steady dividend of $0.1795/share through December 2008. It then dropped its dividend to $0.1167/share.
Alpine Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD)
AOD attempts to optimize both dividend income and long-term growth of capital. This is a very diverse and flexible fund. It employs a global, multi-cap, multi-sector, and multi-style investment approach. The fund combines four research-driven investment strategies – Growth, Value, Special Dividends, and Dividend Capture Rotation.
I first purchased AOD in December 2007. It paid monthly dividends of $0.18/share through February 2009 before cutting its monthly dividend to $0.12/share.
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV)
The Fund seeks to match the investment performance of the Lehman Brothers Mutual Fund Long Government/Corporate Index. Holdings include Corporate Notes/Bond 51.5%, Treasury Notes/Bonds 40.2% and Government Agency Securities 6.5%.
I first purchased BLV in December 2008. Since that time I have received five dividend all approximately $0.34/share. This has been the one bright spot amoung the group. As a long-bond fund, it has behaved as I expected it would.
Conclusion
Back to the original question: Are Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and Closed Ended Funds (CEFs) a good fit for this dividend investing? At this point, I would say no, for the most part. For many of the same reasons that international investments are not a good fit for a dividend-based investing strategy, I have found the same true with ETFs and CEFs.
It has been my experience that ETFs/CEFs dividends exhibit a higher degree of volatility than individual dividend stocks. Since most of the above funds are based on an index, they are forced to buy the bad stocks with the good stocks. This will inherently increase the volatility of the funds dividend payments. Those with international holdings are subject to currency conversion and a different dividend payout philosophy. In the income portion of my portfolio, I place a great deal of value on stability and consistency. ETFs and CEFs have a difficult time delivering either.
The funds are listed is ascending order from least desirable to most. I have already stopped purchasing the above funds, except BLV. I will now work on eliminating or minimizing my position in most of them, starting at the top of the list and working down.
Full Disclosure: Long VFH, PID, VNQ, SDY, VIG, VYM, ETO, AOD, BLV. See a list of all my income holdings here.

_____________________________________________________________________
To a large extent we are a product of our environment. Our life experiences not only shape out behavior, but at its very core, they shape our thought process. The Great Depression forever changed a generation of people. It appears the "Great Recession" may be having a similar effect on another generation.
In a May 5th MSN Money article, Kathy Kristof explores what effect the financial crisis is having on Generation Y (those born between 1977 to 1994). It seems that this generation that lives life on the edge in most of their pursuits, are quite risk-averse when it comes to selecting their investments. That could be a decision that results in them coming up short in retirement. Here are some other interesting items from the article:
There are much better alternatives for the ultra-conservative Gen Y investors than money market accounts, Treasuries and CDs. A conservative strategy focusing on high quality, low risk dividend stocks should significantly out-perform the above investments, with very little incremental long-term risk. Based on my risk rating, here are five low risk companies for conservative investors to consider:
1. The Coca-Cola Company (KO) - Risk Rating: 1.25 - Yield: 3.82% (analysis)
2. Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) - Risk Rating: 1.25 - Yield: 3.62% (analysis)
3. The Clorox Company (CLX) - Risk Rating: 1.25 - Yield: 3.45% (analysis)
4. United Technologies Corporation (UTX) - Risk Rating: 1.00 - Yield: 2.97% (analysis)
5. SYSCO Corporation (SYY) - Risk Rating: 1.00 - Yield: 4.06 (analysis)
What the Gen Y investors haven't realized is that the path they are following carries risk also. Ironically, they may have chosen the most dangerous investment of all.
Full Disclosure: Long KO, JNJ, CLX, UTX, SYY (my income holdings)
Related Articles:

_____________________________________________________________________
Stock Analysis: Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)
Posted by D4L | Tuesday, May 05, 2009 | analysis | 0 comments »This article originally appeared on The DIV-Net April 27, 2009.
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis:
Company Description: Johnson & Johnson engages in the manufacture and sale of various products in the health care field worldwide.
Fair Value: I consider four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
JNJ is trading at a discount to 1.), 2.) and 3.) above. If I exclude the high and low valuations and average the remaining two, JNJ is trading at a 18.2% discount. JNJ earned a Star in this section since it is trading at a fair value.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section I consider five factors, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
JNJ earned one Star in this section for 3.) above. JNJ has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1944 and has increased its dividend payments for 47 consecutive years.
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA)? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
JNJ earned both of the available Stars in this section. The NPV MMA Diff. of the $9,091 is in excess of the $2,500 minimum I look for in a stock that has increased dividends as long as JNJ has. JNJ's current yield of 3.84% exceeds the 3.17% estimated 20-year average MMA rate.
Other: JNJ is a member of the S&P 500, a Dividend Aristocrat and a member of the Broad Dividend Achievers™ Index. JNJ's products are somewhat immune to the economic cycles. The company is diverse in both its products (drugs, medical devices, and consumer products) and customers. JNJ enjoys competitive advantages in financial resources, business scale and global footprint. In the face of challenging prospects in it drug business, JNJ recently diversified into aesthetics products and biosurgical items. Risks include generic erosion in several drugs, pipeline disappointments and unfavorable foreign exchange rates.
Conclusion: JNJ earned one Star in the Fair Value section, earned one Star in the Dividend Analytical Data section and earned two Stars in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a net total of four Stars. This quantitatively ranks JNJ as a 4 Star-Buy.
Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the share price could increase to $62.25 before JNJ's NPV MMA Differential fell to the $3,000 that I like to see. At that price the stock would yield 2.63%.
Resetting the D4L-PreScreen.xls model and solving for the dividend growth rate needed to generate the needed $3,000 NPV MMA Differential, the calculated rate is 2.4%. This dividend growth rate is significantly below the 7.5% used in this analysis, thus providing a margin of safety. JNJ has a risk rating of 1.25 which classifies it as a low risk stock.
JNJ is truly one of the elites dividend stocks and offers everything a dividend investor is looking for to support a steadily increasing dividend - excellent business model, strong balance sheet with low debt and supported by consistent cash flows. I plan to add to my position when JNJ is below by $62.25 buy price. For additional information, including the stock's dividend history, please refer to its data page.
Disclaimer: Material presented here is for informational purposes only. The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I was long in JNJ (1.7% of my Income Portfolio). What are your thoughts on JNJ?
Related Articles:

_____________________________________________________________________
Popular Posts Last 30 Days
-
High-yielding stocks are investors’ best friends. The extra payout helps increase a stock’s returns or offsets losses. As such, they make gr...
-
Sometimes it's all about dividends and dividend growth. The higher the growth rate, the better the valuation of the stock. Not often enough,...
-
From humble beginnings as a phone technician at Bell Canada, a Francis Chou emerged as one of the leading Canadian value investors of the de...
-
Ken Fisher is CEO and chief investment officer of Fisher Investments. Also, he has been contributing to the “Portfolio Strategy” column at F...
-
The investment strategy of "buy and hold" has lost favor of late. However, for long-term investing, there are still strong stocks that, I be...
-
So where does an investor stand who wants to invest in oil without taking too many risks? The answer lies in dividend stocks. A steady strea...
-
I wanted to share a sneak peek into our Top 10 Stocks for 2012. And as a thank you for being a DividendOpportunities subscriber, I’ve select...
-
Bill Gates is chairman of Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), the worldwide leader in software, services and solutions. He discovered his interest...
-
Stocks deliver their return as a mix of dividends and appreciation. For the average stock, the mix leans a little toward appreciation. But y...
-
Enjoy that wimpy interest rate from your bank account? Of course not, and billionaire Warren Buffett doesn't care for those paltry rates, ei...








